Thursday, May 21, 2015
Within their motion, I noticed they were running an interesting, yet simple, secondary series which I will diagram that action below. I really liked the introductory flex type action and what they ran out of it.
The action started out with a reversal and the post setting a back/flex screen for the wing on the guard's side. After running that action they ran two different looks.
The first option they ran was to have the post step out and catch the ball. The point then ran off the post and got a dribble hand off and attacked the paint.
They would also quickly swing the ball back to the guard. If they did the guard would get an immediate down hill ball screen from the big.
A third action they ran, aside from the back screen, was a point to wing dribble at and back cut. As the wing back cut, the post rose. The ball was passed to the post on the elbow. As the post caught it the back side guard dove and the back side wing filled. The point passed to the backside wing filling the guard spot then down screened the ball side wing who back cut.
I am sure as I watch the game more I'll pick out more great secondary actions. These are simple, but very effective. I really like the movement and offensive opportunities they create!
Friday, May 15, 2015
This idea was put to the test in the 1980s to clean up the New York City Subways. The Subway system was a haven for crime from graffiti and fare jumpers to muggings and beatings. What law enforcement did to clean it up was start with arresting and charging every fare jumper and constantly cleaning all the graffiti, instead of the muggings and murders. Some people wondered why - why waste time on "trivial" stuff like fare jumping and graffiti? But then something amazing happened - crime took a nose dive. Part of the reason was in arresting the fare jumpers they were getting people with weapons and intent to commit bigger crimes. By constantly cleaning up graffiti they were proving they had pride for the subways. But more importantly it sent the message that the subway was important and they weren't going to stand for anything. It got people thinking: "If they are this mad about fare jumping, what are they going to do to us?"
Great story, but what does this have to do with coaching? Well, a lot I think. As a coach I think it's important to identify and fix your "broken windows". What are the small, almost unnoticeable, things that are leading to bigger problems? You might not even notice them until you examine the situation. What things are you letting slide that are encouraging players to have bigger issues? It could be with players or parents. Either way, it's definitely worth examining and fixing before they become real problems.
Wednesday, May 13, 2015
But this post is not to defend David Blatt. He's a big boy and he can handle it himself. This post is to talk about his recent comments on coaching and how people perceive "coaching". For insight into what people think "coaching" is, we need to look no further than Blatt's defense of himself this week:
Well....yeah... Obviously Blatt has received a fair dose of criticism and a flood of memes. While this statement makes me laugh I think it's an accurate insight to how many people perceive coaching. If you were to survey the layperson who watches basketball, they likely believe that the game is dictated by game coaching and that coaches really are making 150-200 critical decisions in the course of a game. Kind of like when you play NBA 2K at home and control the player's ever move. Why do I think that? Look at all the coaches in the NBA who are getting fired - especially over what happens in games - obviously someone thinks that their game time decisions are costing their team's wins.
This is a big problem that I believe coaches face. The truths of coaching I have found are:
- Players win games on game day.
- Coaches win games in practice.
My point being that coaching is not about the "game day decisions", as I believe a small percentage of games each year are won and lost on those - as important as they may be. Good or bad coaching happens every day in practice with the tactics and habits that you engrain there. It's about making a few big decisions on how you are going to run your team and then executing them in practice. Practice is the teaching and the game day is the test.
Monday, March 30, 2015
What does "pace" mean anyway? It doesn't mean hoisting up shots right away, thats for sure. Pace to me is more about how quickly they move the ball and people in their offense. Teams that play with great pace are quickly, and constantly, moving the ball and people. They aren't waiting a long time to "let things develop" they are forcing the action and making things happen. They also aren't running their stuff robotically, they are constantly looking for openings to attack and make moves.
Saturday, February 28, 2015
The set starts in a line. Put a shooter first to occupy the defense on the back side. A post player is second. Your best shooter is the third player in line. The first player goes basket and corners out. The second player goes to the ball side corner. The third player cuts hard to the rim (sometimes you can get this shot). The inbounder throws to the corner who reverses to the point at the top. The third guy in line, who dove in-screens the inbounder who curls to the rim.
Here is a short clip of Euroleague team Maccabi Tel Aviv running something pretty similar in a game this year.
Thursday, February 19, 2015
Anyway, Hope Academy was up 2 with .4 seconds left in the game. It was Bethany's ball on the sideline at about the top of the key extended. Based on the time, they had to go for a tip in to win or tie.
What they ran was pure genius. I don't remember the alignment (I wish I would have!), but they basically ran an action bringing a shooter to the ball and occupying the defense. As they did that, they had a big 1-2 steps off the backside block just hanging out. At the last second they threw it off the backboard to the big for a tip in! Kid missed the tip in, but he was darn close to tying the game. The reason it worked was because everyone was between the ball and their man and his man was, smartly, helping a little more to play anything to the rim. It was the perfect set up and ALMOST perfect execution. I'm always a big fan of out of the ordinary situations stuff and this definitely falls into that category.